Interesting article on MSN today.
Review found physical punishment of kids linked to unprotected, masochistic sex as adults.
"Researchers have uncovered another damaging consequence of spanking:
risky sexual behaviors, or even sexual deviancy, when the child grows
up."This adds one more harmful side effect to spanking," said
Murray Straus, a spanking expert who was expected to present the
findings of four studies at the American Psychological Association's
Summit on Violence and Abuse in Relationships in Bethesda, Md., on
Thursday."
That's the basic gist of the article. This article really tells me nothing about the link from being spanked as a child to wanting to be spanked as an adult. I guess if I wanted more than the cliff notes I should have been in Bethesda on Thursday.
I'd like to see information like that backed up with some facts. I would think that if someone was to write an article that makes the statement this article does, the writer would add as many of the compelling details as possible. Otherwise, they just look foolish, as is the case here, in my opinion.
I mean, don't get me wrong, I am absolutely on the anti-spanking side of the fence. I just don't want ridiculous information to be presented from "my side" of the fence. It weakens our stance.
My studies have found that spanking is a symptom of the problem, not the cause. Lazy and/or ignorant parenting are the causes. The same thing that leads to spanking also leads to lack of communication between parents and their kids about the tough subjects like sex, which directly leads to risky teen and even preteen sexual behavior.
In conclusion my studies have shown that parents that use spanking in place of sensible methods of discipline also do other things that cause risk to their children's futures, including but not limited to allowing the child's perceptions of a healthy sexual relationships to be warped by lack of communication of solid factual information from parent to child.
I am expected to present my findings in the parking lot behind Wendy's on Monday.
The article goes on to talk about dose response, how people who were spanked are 5 times more likely to hit their relationship partners than those who were not spanked and that spanking can lead to anti-social and aggressive behavior. Possibly true, but not really relevant to the idea that "Spanking Raises Chances of Risky, Deviant Sexual Behavior".
A passage of interest...
"However, some 90 percent of U.S. parents spank toddlers, according to Straus."
Two points to make about this statement.
1. This says "according to Straus". Why? Did this reporter not do their own research? I see no point of this article except to send a "nanny nanny boo boo" to the spanking side of the fence.
2. Ninety percent CAN NOT be an accurate number. It just can't be. Does anyone out their have any real information on the percentages of spankers vs. non-spankers?